Comment #5 on issue 171 by dhanji: bind(SomeConcreteType.class).toConstructor() http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=171
I think that is acceptable. having two bind rules that chain toCtor implies wanting two separate instances methinks. The ctor is the end point of every bind rule anyway (whether implicitly or in this awesome new jessefeature) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
