Comment by technical0: *phasmal:* I completely agree with you. I have never understood why anyone would want to replace something a simple as the new operator with some kind of library and annotations. I would personally maintain that everything that you can do with Guice, you can also do in standard Java and in a much more concise way, as per your example.
*limpbizkit:* I am at a loss to see how you can consider that elementary object construction can somehow become "out of control" or not "scale". Guice is a "solution" for something that was quite simply never a problem in the first place. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Motivation -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
