Sam, Thanks for scrubbing these, and I agree that you should mark them all as "won't fix". A few miscellaneous comments below...
On Apr 25, 4:36 pm, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=106- make guice > annotations a separate build artifact > - Not worth it IMHO. Although, if we did support it then it should contain > the guice analogue of the javax.inject classes. (That's not a bad idea, > actually..) We don't need a .jar with Guice annotations since anyone that needs 'em should prefer the JSR-330 annotations anyway. > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=422- Allow type > inference in assisted injection > - Wants to translate parameters (factory requests String, impl has > @Assisted Integer). Unless we can somehow do this with the type conversion > code... which admittedly I haven't thought through. Anyone who wants to do exotic stuff like that can just bind a regular implementation of the factory class! I prefer to avoid adding framework for problems that plain code solves easily. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
