Here's the issue :
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4423

I received that before this message :D

Christian

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Christian Edward Gruber
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Can you talk through the use-cases for user-defined just-in-time bindings?
>  As far as I can see, using providers to obtain just-in-time binding
> behaviour is highly dangerous.  i can imagine some leegitimate use-cases for
> it, but most of the time when people talk about such things (often injecting
> a Provider as a workaround) they really are trying to workaround Guice's
> lack of lifecycle support.
>
> One of my deepest concerns with JIT bindings is the wonderful way in which
> it moves your wiring errors JIT as well, which makes debugging more
> difficult, and can result in learning about such errors in production AFTER
> deployment, depending on the particular layout and timings of your
> injections.  So, powerful, but dangerous and there might be more suitable
> ways to accomplish what you want.
>
> What would you need just-in-time bindings for?
>
> Christian.
>
>
> On May 31, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Pascal-Louis wrote:
>
>  Hi all,
>>
>> We've had a long standing grudge against Guice (which we love in all
>> other respects!): the inability to have user-defined just-in-time
>> bindings.
>>
>> Over the course of the long weekend, I've implemented this feature and
>> would love some feedback. Check it out on
>> http://eng.kaching.com/2010/05/just-in-time-providers-for-guice.html.
>>
>> I would specifically appreciate feedback from the Guice team on the
>> process to integrate this patch into trunk. On a more tactical note, I
>> was unsure about which injection points to use, see the ??? comment in
>> the method
>>
>> http://github.com/pascallouisperez/guice-jit-providers/blob/master/src/com/google/inject/internal/InjectorImpl.java#LID830
>> .
>>
>> Best,
>> PL
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "google-guice-dev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-guice-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to