Comment #11 on issue 519 by limpbizkit: toProvider() should continue to use Guice's Provider, not JSR-330's
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=519
I'd like to phase out Guice's Provider, @Inject, @Named and @BindingAnnotation types, encouraging users to use their JSR-330 replacements. Making c.g.i.Provider extend j.i.Provider enables users to migrate incrementally.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
