On 07/07/10 08:04, Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote: > It was just an experiment--it's going to be removed entirely. We need to > rethink it from the ground up.
OOI, what are the underlying reasons behind deciding that it needs a rethink? Max. > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Max Bowsher <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > The code in the lifecycle directory of the source looks rather > interesting. > > On the other hand, there has been mention of removing it (but without a > rationale that I saw). > > Whatever the case, it would be nice to get the status of that code > clarified before 3.0. > > Max. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "google-guice-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
