Great idea! This would be in line with how Preconditions works, which is essentially what this call is about.
-Andrew On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Dhanji R. Prasanna <[email protected]>wrote: > Right now we can require bindings but that just spits out a missing binding > error. I think it would be cool to allow users to specify a why it's > required. > > requireBinding(UnitOfWork.class, "Persistence provider must bind an > implementation for the unit of work to be managed. This is likely not a user > error but an error in your persistence provider's module implementation.") > > Dhanji. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
