Comment #1 on issue 564 by dean.hiller: binding to a generic and fix for it too...
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=564
hmmmm, I think the fix needs to be more upstream now. It turns out I have an annotation working just fine where the key is with the generic but it still seems to wire up the correct implementation via the annotation on the XXX<M> generic class so I am not sure the best fix here now.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
