Comment #2 on issue 660 by [email protected]: Add utility method to get the Set<Dependency<?>> representing injection of an object
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=660
No, but neither is there a reason that writing one's own dependency injection framework can't do the trick, and yet you provide Guice. Libraries are supposed to make things easy for their callers.
It took me some time to convince myself that that chain of calls was the proper way to establish dependencies on an object being injected and there wasn't another better way that I was missing. Guice should provide a single method so programmers don't duplicate that mental work.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
