The non-dev group is probably a better place for discussion to ask if non-devs build from source. FWIW, I personally prefer Ant (it's just so much easier to reason with), but understand that most systems work better with Maven. sam
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Christian Edward Gruber <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi, > > So… there is an ant build and a maven build, and a lot of duplicated > information. Who, other than active contributors, builds the source, and > do we really need to support both? Or, if we are hard-set on supporting > ant and maven, I would like to at least use the maven ant tags to start to > pull some of the duplicated metadata into one place. I'm going to spend > the next two years of my life in this code base and I'd like to not have to > maintain multiple build systems, if at all possible But before I do that, > I wanted to check who, if anyone, really cares. > > Christian. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
