2008/10/10 Kevin Bourrillion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > James, thanks for the kind words! We will certainly look at these > possibilities once we hammer out an official 1.0 release of the collections > (which was not a high priority in Q3 but is becoming so once again, so it > should happen by end of year). Any other ideas for how this should work > technically are welcome in this thread.
>From a maven repo perspective, we'd just have a different artefacts (in maven-speak an artefact is typically a pom.xml and a jar with maybe some other files associated like the javadoc/src jar for debugging). Then folks could use whichever version of guice they preferred; the jarjar-d one or not -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
