What about no-arg constructors?Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2:05 am, "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Bob/Jesse - any feedback on the reasoning for this restriction - >> forcing a mandatory @Inject on a class with a single public >> constructor with arguments? >> > > Adding a new constructor should not break your > code. If we supported lone constructors, we'd get > into trouble that way. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
