On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:05 PM, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > So there's definitely plusses and minuses to this. > > Sure adding a new constructor breaks things - but then it would break > things very fast (in the same way that adding a parameter to a > constructor might break things too). Folks should run unit test cases > so catch these breakages pretty quickly. Yea but the point is that break is caught at compile time in idiomatic Java, and doesn't require unit testing. > On the plus side - think of the zillions of Java classes out there > that Guice would be able to automatically inject without folks having > to write their own magic AOP bytecode swizzler, get access to the > code, hack it and re-release it or write custom providers. I can see the merit in this argument. Dhanji. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
