Guice trunk has support for @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
public MyClass(Some param, @Nullable Other param) { ... }Robbie On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Gili Tzabari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > The problem is that JAX-RS knows how to inject some classes, Guice > the others, and there is no way for me to use constructor injection > where some objects come from Guice and others from JAX-RS. At least, I > don't know how this could be done. > > As for the package-private constructor approach, I'd want to use one > constructor for production (without UriInfo) and another one for testing > (with UriInfo) and Guice injecting both of them (which you can't do). > > Would it be possible to have a single Guice-injected constructor > that includes objects such as UriInfo which Guice doesn't know how to > inject, then telling Guice to simply bind them to null at production > time and a mock object at testing time? Somehow I suspect Guice doesn't > let you inject null... > > Gili > > Robbie Vanbrabant wrote: > > In general you should dependency inject it, using constructor > > injection or method injection. > > Field injection is only a good idea in code that you don't need to > > test. I would image that JAX-RS does more than just field injection? > > If that doesn't work, you could add a constructor and make it package > > private. Or create a builder using a library that makes it easy > > (shameless self-promotion: http://tinyurl.com/builderbuilder). > > > > Robbie > > > > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I've got code that runs on top of JAX-RS and Guice. All my classes > use > > construction injection. One such class has the following field: > > > > @Context UriInfo uri; > > > > that is injected after-the-fact by JAX-RS. > > > > When I try unit testing this code I run into a problem because I'm > not > > sure how to inject a mock object in place of "uri". Guice isn't > > injecting it in the first place. I was thinking of adding UriInfo to > > the constructor and making it optional but Guice doesn't support that > > sort of thing. Alternatively I could add a setUri() method to be used > > exclusively by the test framework but this seems a bit ugly. > > > > I'm new to unit testing. I would appreciate some advice. > > > > Thank you, > > Gili > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
