On Oct 28, 9:58 pm, Gili Tzabari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know you're not a fan of exposing a new method but *please* consider the
> cost/benefit for us poor web users :)
We're sympathetic. I don't like the idea of Guice having consequences
on deployment. Or redeployment.
Perhaps we could clean up the FRQ code by moving classloading to its
own helper class. This would make that code testable, and perhaps
worthy of inclusion...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
