Jesse, I'll take a look at the new SPI soon and give you some feedback. On a separate note, is it possible to target issues 288, 289 for Guice 2.0?
Gili On Dec 24, 11:50 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > I've updated the Guice SPI to include proper interfaces for all the > binding types. We now have InstanceBinding, ProviderInstanceBinding > and several others. These compliment the existing binding target > visitors, which we decided were a little clumsy for sophisticated use. > > There's also a new interface, HasDependencies. This interface is > targetted for extensions and frameworks that build on Guice. > - Extension authors should implement this interface in their Provider > implementations. When you implement this interface, you seize control > over which types are exposed as your provider's dependency. This way > you can help tools out, and make your dependencies more specific than > just 'Injector.class'. > - Tool authors will be able to take this dependency information and > integrate it into their wares. Better dependency information means > better graphing, visualization and IDE navigation! > > You can grab the new changes from SVN. Or browse the Javadoc > here:http://google-guice.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/latest-javadoc/com/googl... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
