2009/1/14 Robbie Vanbrabant <[email protected]>:
> I think the more elegant solution (Guice 2.0) would be to use private
> modules:
> http://google-guice.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/latest-javadoc/com/google/inject/PrivateModule.html

How stable is Guice 2.0? Is there an estimated release date?

> Avoiding work in modules is almost always a good thing, explained here:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/ModulesShouldBeFastAndSideEffectFree

Hah, see, I knew there'd be a downside to listening to advice from a
noob (i.e. me).

Andrew.

-- 
New site launched: http://biotext.org.uk/

I am retiring my old email addresses.
Please use [email protected] where firstname = andrew.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to