On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Dhanji R. Prasanna <[email protected]>wrote:
> I think saying that @ImplementedBy tightly couples or exposes > implementation details is just religious handwaving. Changing the impl > details does not break tests or client code and that is the real point of > loose coupling and DI. > I didn't realize it didn't until I re-read the doc that guice first look for explicit bindings.. so that is "VERY" cool. You do get the best of both worlds. Awesome. > OTOH @Implemented by is *not* typesafe, and this is a real problem. And the > one reason you should prefer explicit bindings where possible. > > Dhanji. > > -- Rick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
