2009/1/23 Anthony MULLER <[email protected]> > Sure, I can write the parser and build a module. But what do you think > about using the RFC124 XML format? >
personally I'm ambivalent about it at the moment, would need to see how well it maps in practice > Anthony > > 2009/1/23 Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> > >> 2009/1/23 Anthony MULLER <[email protected]> >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'ld like to write my bindings in XML following "standard"... >>> >>> I read about OSGI RFC 124 because I have simple bindings of my object >>> model and bindings for my services... >>> >>> What do you think about this? RFC124 is Spring-oriented... :-/ >>> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >>> <components> >>> <component id="com.sap.i051610.mybundle.model.IMyObject" >>> class="com.sap.i051610.mybundle.model.impl.MyObjectImpl" scope="prototype" >>> /> >>> </components> >>> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >>> <components> >>> <service interface="com.sap.i051610.mybundle.services.IMyService"> >>> <component >>> class="com.sap.i051610.mybundle.services.impl.MyServiceImpl" >>> scope="singleton" /> >>> </service> >>> </components> >>> >>> Advantages will be that the bindings will be readeable by me (using >>> Guice) and a standard-osgi framework too... >>> >> >> FYI, Bob has in the past mentioned about using a custom module >> to suck in XML and turn it into bindings at runtime - the benefit is >> that this doesn't require any change to Guice itself, you just have >> to write a module to do this(!) >> >> Anthony >>> >> -- >> Cheers, Stuart >> > > > -- Cheers, Stuart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
