not sure if this helps, but this is what I did to force the module to
initialize at application startup rather than when the first action is
hit, which is the default behaviour, bit of a hack but it works
extend the struts2 filterdispatcher and use it in the web.xml instead
public class ExtendedFilterDispatcher extends FilterDispatcher {
@Override
public void init(FilterConfig filterConfig) throws ServletException {
super.init(filterConfig);
try {
Container cont = super.dispatcher.getContainer();
ObjectFactory.setObjectFactory(cont.getInstance
(ObjectFactory.class));
//any valid object will do to trigger GuiceModule
initialisation
//the rest of startups can happen there
ObjectFactory.getObjectFactory().buildBean(QuartzService.class,
null);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Ron
On Jan 23, 12:22 am, Brian Yarger <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm working on a little experiment trying to ditch spring in a struts2
> project. We are using spring primarily for 3 things; DI, annotations
> based Transaction support with hibernate/JPA, and authentication/
> authorization.
>
> I've identified guice, warp-persist, and jsecurity to replace our
> usage of spring. Now, comes the hard part. Each of these frameworks
> seems to want to be the creator of the guice injector. I'd ideally
> like to instantiate guice myself, in a ServletContextListener or
> something similar, upstream to all the frameworks that will consume
> it.
>
> This seems like something that isn't that hard to do with both warp-
> persist, and jsecurity, but the problems arise when we get to
> struts2. Because struts2 expects it's ObjectFactory implementation to
> "discover" all the relavent classes during struts2 initialization I
> have a bit of a chicken and egg problem. I can't setup the bindings
> to all the struts2 classes (actions, interceptors, results, etc) in my
> Module because they're not known yet.
>
> Is there a proper way to handle adding bindings to an existing guice
> configuration outside a module? I'm sure I can expose the Binder
> somehow and get it done, but I'd like to know if there is a more
> framework supported or encouraged way to handle this.
>
> Brian Yarger
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
