Hello -
"@Inject @Named("foo") Sink sink" -- simple enough, just bind
( Sink.class ).annotatedWith( Names.named("foo").to(....). The rub is
that I need to pass the string "foo" into the factory which actually
creates 'Sink'. Also, the factory needs to be guice-created (of
course!)
I know the list of names right now as they're hard-coded into my
module (although I'd like to switch this to multibindings at some
point)
My solution now is terribly hacky -- it amounts to this:
Set<String> sinkNames = .... // would prefer multi bindings
for( String name : sinkNames )
bind( Sink.class ).annotatedWith( Names.named( name ) ).toProvider
( SinkProvider.class ).in( new TerribleHackScope( name ) );
And in TerribleHackScope I put the name on a thread local before
unscoped.get(), and SinkProvider reaches into that thread local for
the name of the sink to create and passes it to the (injected)
factory. All this leaves a bad hacker taste.
Any ideas?
Feeling I'm missing somethign obvious,
-d
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
