2009/3/1 bank kus <[email protected]>
>
> Would it be totally unjustified to say this is working around the
> problem not solving it. Consider I m using Components A and B to build
> up Component C. Except that component A and B are layered compnents
> build using 50 other components.
>
note that your module structure does not have to mimic your application
structure,
you could have a nested application model that is configured with a flat
sequence
of modules (personally I'd avoid nesting modules unless absolutely
necessary)
but if I did want to use a nested module setup where component C built on
A+B
then perhaps something like this might help (I have not tried this in
practice!!)
C -- PrivateC
/ \
/ \
/ \
A B
| |
| |
PrivateA PrivateB
ie. I'd use a private module in C to bind types that might also be bound
later on
inside A or B, and only expose what I wanted to make public from component C
then when C pulls together A, B, and PrivateC there shouldn't be any
conflict
Now what this would mean is in Component C if I need a Logger I can no
> longer setup a binding inside a module since chances are its used by
> one of the lower components with a different binding so I only ever
> have to use Providers. Perhaps I am missing something colossal in
> which feel free to point that out and I ll go back and reread Guice
> docs /watch the videos (which are excellent btw) and play with the
> examples/tests in the source package :)
>
> banks
>
> On Feb 28, 2:24 pm, Bob Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:12 PM, bank kus <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Though we still need to solve this problem where a top level component
> > > requires an extremely low level component while some of the components
> > > it uses also use this low level component with different bindings.
> >
> > You can also use provider methods (for example to construct the fireplace
> > manually and make sure you throw in the right piece of wood).
> >
> > Bob
> >
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
