Have you tried this on trunk? Im pretty sure I fixed this some time ago.
Jesse, do you remember the initializedSoFar idiom we introduced?
Dhanji.

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Leigh Klotz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> In guice-snapshot20090205, if you have a ServletModule with two calls
> to serve(path, myservlet) for the same servlet, you get two calls to
> myservlet.init().  I believe this is wrong.
>
> Existing state with web.xml configuration:
>  <servlet>
>    <servlet-name>myservlet</servlet-name>
>    <servlet-class>com.example.MyServlet</servlet-class>
>    <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
>  </servlet>
>  <servlet-mapping>
>    <servlet-name>myservlet</servlet-name>
>    <url-pattern>/new/place/*</url-pattern>
>  </servlet-mapping>
>  <servlet-mapping>
>    <servlet-name>myservlet</servlet-name>
>     <url-pattern>//legacy/old/place/*</url-pattern>
>   </servlet-mapping>
>
> This results in only one call to MyServlet.init().  I believe this is
> correct.
>
> I transliterated this web.xml file to a
> ServletModule.configureServlets method which does this:
>  serve("/new/place/*").with(MyServlet.class);
>  serve("/legacy/old/place/*").with(MyServlet.class);
>
> MyServlet is marked as @Singleton.
>
> When I use this module, MyServlet.init() iscalled twice.
>
> I've stepped through ManagedServletPipeline.init and it just iterates
> over the servlet definitions and calls init on each.  The two serve()
> calls above result in two ServletDefinition objects.
> ServletDefinition.init does check to make sure that the HttpServlet
> bound to the servletKey has a Singleton binding, but it doesn't
> protect against two ServletDefinition objects bound to the same
> servletKey.
>
> Leigh.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to