Yea you're right that that is basically the problem. I'll look into this
when I have some time later in the month. Any other volunteers?
Dhanji.

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:45 AM, tchan <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> All right, I took a stab at it and managed to find the problem but I
> don't understand it well enough to fix it.
>
> In Tomcat, the forward to the referenced jsp will eventually be
> serviced by the Jasper jsp servlet.  When the target jsp is defined in
> web.xml, it can just grab its path from that servlet definition entry
> otherwise it has to be a request from RequestDispatcher.  So if it's
> an include, then there's a request attribute with the path already
> otherwise for a forward, Jasper will call request.getServletPath() and
> append getPathInfo() on it as needed.  This is where the problem is.
>
> The request object here is a Guice wrapper object, specifically the
> anonymous HttpServletRequestWrapper class inside
> ServletDefinition.doService().  Its getServlePath() defers to
> computePath() to figure out the servlet path and it *seems* to return
> the servlet mapping of the original servlet rather than the servlet
> path of the jsp forward.  computePath() does defer to its super
> (Tomcat) request object if it can't compute it itself and that wrapped
> request object returns the right servlet path.
>
> So in short, the request wrapper in ServletDefinition has a bug that
> trips jsp forwards in Tomcat.  But I don't understand why it does what
> it tries to do so I'll have to leave it to Dhanji to take a look at
> it.
>
> On May 3, 8:51 am, tchan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don`t mind taking a stab at ii if you can point me in the right
> > direction.  I tried debugging through Tomcat`s pipeline but that was
> > too much for me (and I really couldn`t see a difference between the
> > web.xml and GuiceFilter scenarios).
> >
> > On May 3, 12:25 am, "Dhanji R. Prasanna" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > yea this is a known problem, I just have not had any time to address it
> =(
> > > If you would like to contribute a patch we would be thrilled! Otherwise
> I
> > > hope to get to this problem soon.
> >
> > > Dhanji.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to