2009/5/24 [email protected] <[email protected]> > > On May 22, 12:38 pm, Aleksey Didik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Whenever possible? Why in my example ManagerImpl was created in child > > injector (two different singletons), but BuilderImpl was created in > > ancestor (one singleton for both trees)? Both is just-in-time > > bindings, isn't it? > > The ManagerImpl cannot be created in the parent injector because its > dependencies aren't there (Builder.class is only available in the > child). > But BuilderImpl doesn't have any dependencies, and so it'll be created > in the parent injector. > > For explicit bindings, where it's bound is where it'll be. > For just-in-time bindings (JIT bindings), it'll be bound at the > highest ancestor that satisfies all dependencies. > > Because the JIT case is so, unpredictable, I recommended explicit > bindings for child injectors.
perhaps this is another situation where the Grapher could help - does it handle injector hierarchies? > -- Cheers, Stuart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
