AFAIK request.getRequestDispatcher("/bar") if Guice managed servlet /
bar is bound then you should get the ManagedServletPipeline$2 (The
special RD) but if it is not known then you should get
ApplicationDispatcher (original RD). I am guessing you dont have a
serve("/bar").with(...) call and you get ApplicationDispatcher
instead.

I am quite sure that "/foo/*" pattern works with Guice ;)

Cheers
Alen

On May 28, 4:54 am, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for your response Alen.
>
> I've double checked my request coming in, it's a ServletDefinition
> that contains the ManagedServletPipeline (although what is returned
> from request.getRequestDispatcher("/bar") is an
> ApplicationDispatcher).
>
> For the moment I'm using a redirect to the full URL which works fine.
>
> With regards the url pattern, I'm new to this as well, but when I use
> that pattern you suggest inside Guice it doesn't forward to the
> download servlet at all, forwards or otherwise. It appears Guice does
> not allow that pattern, which is why I am using the regular "/
> download" pattern.
>
> On May 28, 12:44 am, Alen Vrecko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > While I am not a fan of it works on my machine posts this is it.
>
> > Doing httpRequest.getRequestDispatcher("/bar") returns an instance of
> > com.google.inject.servlet.ManagedServletPipeline$2 and calling forward
> > on it works as expected.
>
> > I am not a servlet expert but
>
> > serve("/download").with(DownloadServlet.class); is not the same as
>
> > <url-pattern>/download/*</url-pattern>
>
> > the former will match only exactly for /download and nothing else but
> > the latter will match /download/foo, /download/bar , /download/....
>
> > serve("/download/*") is the same as <url-pattern>/download/*</url-
> > pattern> you put in serve method param what you put in url-pattern.
>
> > Cheers
> > Alen
>
> > On May 27, 10:47 pm, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I'm grabbing the RequestDispatcher from the actual Request passed into
> > > the original servlet (that went through the Guice filter chain), not
> > > the ServletContext, but forwarding to the next Servlet gives me the
> > > 404.
>
> > > On May 27, 8:01 pm, Alen Vrecko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I assume you get the RequestDispatcher from the ServletContext. This
> > > > RD is the original one from the servlet container and as such it
> > > > doesn't know about the servlets you specified in your module.
>
> > > > One the other hand if you get the RD from the Request that one is
> > > > special (enhanced) and it does know about the servlets you specified
> > > > in your module. Try with getting RD from the request.
>
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Alen
>
> > > > On May 27, 4:49 pm, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hey Guys,
>
> > > > > I've seen in another post:
>
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice/browse_thread/thread/f06a...
>
> > > > > that there is an issue forwarding with JSPs. I am having an issue
> > > > > forwarding from one servlet to another.
>
> > > > > I have migrated my servlet to Guice like so:
>
> > > > >    serve("/download").with(DownloadServlet.class);
>
> > > > > from web.xml:
>
> > > > >     <servlet-mapping>
> > > > >         <servlet-name>DownloadServlet</servlet-name>
> > > > >         <url-pattern>/download/*</url-pattern>
> > > > >     </servlet-mapping>
>
> > > > > But when I forward (using getRequestDispatcher) to this servlet in
> > > > > Guice I'm getting a 404, it works fine when in web.xml.
>
> > > > > I had the servlet forwarding issue outlined in the discussion above,
> > > > > and used tchan's "hack" and it solved the jsp forwarding issue, but
> > > > > I'm stumped on this. Any ideas? Is the "/download/*" pattern in the
> > > > > web.xml significant in it's difference from the way it is served with
> > > > > Guice?
>
> > > > > Thanks.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to