Hello Robbie,
Thanks for suggestion and link.
I will look into your code and may be "steal" something.
I'm planning to use jboss-remoting as a communication bus between
client and server.

Aleksey.


On Jul 30, 10:45 pm, Robbie Vanbrabant <[email protected]>
wrote:
> You could try using my port of Spring's 
> HttpInvoker:http://code.google.com/p/garbagecollected/wiki/GuiceHttpInvoker
> It hasn't really been maintained, but it's mostly a 1:1 port of the Spring
> code and has worked for me. It's Guice 1 based but it should be trivial to
> replace the warp servlet dependency and move to Guice 2.0's servlet
> extension (which was based on warp servlet).
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Aleksey Didik <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello all.
> > I want to share my idea  and catch your points of view.
>
> > My application is big, but it's not ejb-web-based application.  It's a
> > Swing client (Guice-driven) which use a server  to synchonize own
> > state with other parts of system. For my application, server is a very
> > small communication and registration center with minimal count of
> > functionality. But  I need RMI and JMS. And I am using JBoss as a
> > server.
> > But JBoss is big, difficult and EJB 3.0 oriented. It's a great
> > appserver, but as to me, it's not what I want to use for my
> > application.
>
> > I want to have something small, fast and simple. Guice is small, fast
> > and simple. But I need RMI and JMS.
> > Is it possible to add RMI and JMS to Guice and use it like small
> > remote container?
>
> > My idea:
>
> > Server side:
>
> > 1) Create server application modules with bindings.
> > 2) Create Injector from application modules plus RemoteServerModule.
> > 3) After injector creation, RemoteServerModule create little server,
> > this server is listening a port.
>
> > ===========================
> >        Module appModule = new AbstractModule() {
> >            protected void configure() {
> >                bind(Registrator.class).to(RegistratorImpl.class);
> >            }
> >        };
> >        Module remoteServerModule = new RemoteServerModule();
> >        Guice.createInjector(appModule, remoteServerModule);
> > ===========================
>
> > Client side:
>
> > 1) Create application modules with bindings.
> > 2) Create Injector from application modules plus RemoteClientModule.
> > 3) RemoteClientModule on configure() call, request bindings of server
> > Guice contaner and bind them into client Guice container (binding Key -
> > > RemoteProxyProvider).
> > 4) If Key from server Guice container is injected, RemoteProxyProvider
> > create new Proxy class (cglib!) which provide communication with
> > server. On server side we have a real instance which is linked to
> > client proxy.
>
> > ============================
> >        Module myModule = new AbstractModule() {
> >            protected void configure() {
> >                bind(UserManager.class).to(UserManagerImpl.class);
> >            }
> >        };
>
> >        RemoteClientModule remoteClientModule = new RemotetClientModule
> > ("host");
>
> >        Injector inj = Guice.createInjector(myModule,
> > remoteClientModule);
> >        UserManager userManager = inj.getInstance(UserManager.class);
>
> > public class UserManagerImpl implements UserManager {
>
> >    //from server
> >    private final Registrator registrator;
>
> >   �...@inject
> >    public UserManagerImpl(Registrator registrator) {
> >        this.registrator = registrator;
> >    }
> > ...
> > }
> > ==============================
>
> > Ok, what we have:
> > 1) Just add one server module to create server!
> > 2) Just any number of client modules to connect to any numbers of
> > servers.
> > 3) For client application you could inject server component to own
> > components, almost no difference.
> > 4) Server application is Guice driven and simple.
>
> > I have write first version of my idea, a little proof of concept, but
> > before making further development, I want to ask Guice community, is
> > it necessary? Or may be I discover the continents again?
>
> > What do you think about this idea?
>
> > Best regards,
> > Aleksey.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to