So basically this means that I need to have each bindable element in the child module be injected with something that is defined only within the child module? Even if it does not really requires it? Is that what you mean in explicit binding in the child module?
On Aug 4, 9:45 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 4, 8:41 am, kimchy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is this the intended behavior? I was thinking that any type listener > > I bind in the child injector should be applied to anything I bind in > > the child injector... > > Yup, this is the intended behaviour. The workaround is to create an > explicit binding in the child module - perhaps something like this: > bind(FooImpl.class); --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
