I noticed that the com.google.common.base.Objects utility class
consists of two static method. Should one ever use Guice to inject
utility classes? Is there a reason this wasn't done in this case?

In fact, I believe this is related to a previous discussion we had
about exposing Guice in public APIs. Is Google Collections an example
of avoiding the use of Guice in public APIs? Do any of Google's public
APIs expose Guice? Or do they keep it hidden in the hood?

Thanks,
Gili
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to