Tim,
Mind outlining the things you'd do different this time? I might take a
stab at some of them...

On Oct 28, 4:21 am, Tim Peierls <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't have time to do it, and I don't think anyone else is working
> on it ... go for it! (I gave up when it wasn't a simple recompile.)
>
> There are a number of things I would do differently given the new
> features of Guice 2.0, but maybe a minimal patch that works is the
> best thing for now.
>
> --tim
>
> On Oct 27, 9:31 am, Patrick Lightbody <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Anyone doing this? The DWR integration code is still on Guice 1.0 and
> > when I tried upgrading I got quite a few errors. Before I dive in to
> > this and send the DWR guys a patch, just wanted to check if others
> > have already tackled this problem.
>
> > Patrick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to