bind( MyClass.class ) is 100% optional. I do it, but them I'm pedantic about things.
-d On Nov 7, 3:49 pm, Moandji Ezana <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:01 AM, dg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > just > > > bind(MyClass.class); > > Do you even have to do that? I thought JIT bindings were created when none > existed, as long as you have a no-arg constructor or inject classes that are > either bound or also have a no-arg constructor. > > Here are two JUnit test I wrote to try this out: > > @Test > public void inject_no_arg_constructor_without_binding() { > Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(); > TestEntity instance = injector.getInstance(TestEntity.class); > assertNotNull(instance); > } > > @Test > public void > inject_one_arg_constructor_that_takes_TestEntity_without_binding() { > Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(); > InjectedEntity injectedEntity = > injector.getInstance(InjectedEntity.class); > assertNotNull(injectedEntity); > assertNotNull(injectedEntity.testEntity); > } > > From the newly-updated wiki page: " > > While it is not recommended practice, sometimes you might need to bind a > concrete class without having an interface to which to bind it." > > Like Jon Vaughan, I'm also fairly new to Guice. Why is this considered bad > practice, if the interface would not raise the level of abstraction? > > And is there a difference between bind(MyClass.class) and not binding at > all? > > Moandji --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
