I've created a simple framework to deal with security. I've created a
interface named SecurityContext. This interface holds the user id and a set
of roles (strings). This class has a Servlet Session scope. The idea of the
session scope is to work on it just as a cache, the valid information I
store on a cookie using blowsfish algorithm, so the application uses the
session as a cache and the timeout of the login you can define inside the
cookie. This framework will be public soon, as soon as I finish the
annotation part to check the current user roles.
Let me know if I was confuse in this explanation, I'm writing it fast not
thinking too much..


On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Brian Pontarelli <[email protected]>wrote:

> Yeah, that's the basic gist of it. You definitely don't want to use a
> Singleton for managing the current user, otherwise you can only have a
> single person logged in :) Otherwise, this is pretty much what you need. You
> probably want to make the annotations more flexible as well and I would
> abstract out the whole login and current user process into some type of JEE
> filter system. JCatapult uses a filter type of system via like Spring does
> where it transfers control from the JEE filter into a JCatapult workflow
> chain. That way the workflows can be injected thereby allowing everything
> running inside the web application (less the single JEE filter) to be
> injected.
>
> -bp
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Alexandre Walter Pretyman wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I stumbled upon a very interesting post on using AOP on Guice for
> > security. It might be helpful to you:
> >
> >
> http://jpz-log.info/archives/2009/11/04/guice-it-up-or-aop-can-be-made-simple-sometimes/
> >
> > it is written by an author who identifies himself as jponge, but I
> > couldn't find out his real name.
> >
> > Definitely worth a read.
> >
> > Alex.
> >
> > On Dec 1, 3:04 pm, Brian Pontarelli <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Spring Security covers the login and web security as well as the object
> level security.
> >>
> >> In terms of the login and web security, I wrote this stuff myself for
> JCatapult. It was pretty simple in general, but the gist is that a Servlet
> filter looks for a specific URL (i.e. /jcatapult-security-check) and then
> uses a well defined class to perform the login. You can also write a URI
> authorizer as well to verify that a user has specific roles and which roles
> can access a specific URI.
> >>
> >> In terms of object level security, this is just a matter of writing a
> bit of AOP to check the users privileges prior to invoking a method. The way
> I handle this that during login, I stuff the User object into the session.
> Each request in my security filter I pull it out and stuff it into a
> ThreadLocal. Then, I just pull the User from the ThreadLocal and inspect it
> in a MethodInterceptor based on an annotation on the method.
> >>
> >> I find it is generally pretty simple to write all this stuff in a
> library that I can re-use across projects. You can check out the code in the
> JCatapult Security library to get an idea of how I did it all:
> >>
> >>
> http://code.google.com/p/jcatapult/source/browse/#svn/jcatapult-secur...
> >>
> >> -bp
> >>
> >> On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:09 AM, severin wrote:
> >>
> >>> What would be the best way to manage security and user roles with
> >>> google guice ? (like spring security for example)
> >>
> >>> Thank you for your answers !
> >>
> >>> Severin
> >>
> >>> --
> >>
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "google-guice" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]>
> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-guice" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-guice" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>
>
>


-- 
Eduardo S. Nunes
http://enunes.org

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.


Reply via email to