Yes, you're looking for AbstractModule.requireBinding() Dhanji.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:45 PM, eric <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm writing some Design pattern for guice modulling, and some point > puzzles me: > > I want to have a module (A) that depends on a service S ( let say a > database session manager). > moduleA is not my main module, and therefore I don't want to bind the > service S to any actual classes. (kind of "abstract" module). > > I my code, in introduce injection point to the service S, and I expect > that those bindings will be satisfied in the "real app". When it's the > case, everything works fine. > > But I would like to "declare" within moduleA that it "requires" S. So > that consumers of my ModuleA knows that they need to provide a binding > for the serviceA. > > My concern is that actually the injection point is hidden somewhere in > the whole code, and it won't appear until Runtime. Application > construction team have no mean to be aware of this "required" service > that hey must bind. > > Is there a way to declare this "required" binding ? is there a way to > see it (using graph for instance) ? is there a possibility to "check" > a module for binding "correctness" ( there is no "unwired" keys) > > thank you > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
