Carl,

My problem is when I need to create another TcpInputSourceProvider and
> need to bind a StreamFactory for BTcpStream.class or CTcpStream.class.


When do you need to do this?  At configure() time?  At runtime when the
application is live?

-Fred

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:27 AM, cdawg92 <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been looking at making an application Guicey, but I'm beginning
> to think that I may be over complicating things trying to use Guice.
> In short, the application has to listen to various input sources for
> information. At this time these input sources are TCP with each source
> having a different port from the same ip address, ending up with
> potentially up to 3 inputs from a single host. Anyway, the input
> source is configured the same way with only the host and port being
> different. I won't know the host:port till runtime so I created a
> factory to provide the underlying Stream interface passing in a
> property object containing all the possible ports for the host. I have
> then created a Provider for the final InputSource that takes in a list
> of host properties and a Stream factory and returns a list of
> InputSources. The classes bound to the factory know which ports they
> are to retrieve from the host properties. Here's an example:
>
> The provider:
>
> public class TcpInputSourceProvider implements
>                Provider<List<InputSourceStringImpl>> {
>
>        List<SdvServerProperties> servers;
>        TcpStreamFactory factory;
>
>        @Inject
>        public TcpInputSourceProvider(@StreamFactory TcpStreamFactory
> factory,
>                        @ServerProperties List<SdvServerProperties>
> servers){
>                this.factory = factory;
>                this.servers = servers;
>        }
>
>        @Override
>        public List<InputSourceStringImpl> get() {
>                List<InputSourceStringImpl> ret = new
> ArrayList<InputSourceStringImpl>(servers.size());
>                for(SdvServerProperties server : servers){
>                        ret.add(new TcpInputSource(factory.create(server)));
>                }
>                return ret;
>        }
> }
>
> And the module:
> public class InputSourceModule extends AbstractModule {
>
>        List<SdvServerProperties> servers;
>
>        public InputSourceModule(List<SdvServerProperties> servers){
>                this.servers = servers;
>        }
>        /* (non-Javadoc)
>         * @see com.google.inject.AbstractModule#configure()
>         */
>        @Override
>        protected void configure() {
>                bind(new TypeLiteral <List<SdvServerProperties>>()
> {}).annotatedWith(ServerProperties.class).toInstance(servers);
>
> bind(TcpStreamFactory.class).annotatedWith(StreamFactory.class).toProvider(
>
>  FactoryProvider.newFactory(TcpStreamFactory.class,
> ATcpStream.class));
>                bind(new TypeLiteral <List<InputSourceStringImpl>>()
> {}).annotatedWith(TInput.class).toProvider(TcpInputSourceProvider.class);
>       }
> }
>
> My problem is when I need to create another TcpInputSourceProvider and
> need to bind a StreamFactory for BTcpStream.class or CTcpStream.class.
> How can I bind different factories to the Provider?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> Carl.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-guice" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.

Reply via email to