Thanks a lot Kazimierz, Dhanji

Will give it a try

Yaniv

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Dhanji R. Prasanna <[email protected]>wrote:

> That sounds reasonable. Another important point is to call
> GuiceFilter.destroy() on tearDown()
>
> Dhanji.
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Kazimierz Pogoda <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:21 PM, yaniv kessler <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I wanted to know if anyone tried to artificially induce scopes like
>> Request
>> > or Session in unit tests and what is the best way to go about it.
>>
>> I tried with success, though my solution is specific to GWT RCP
>> testing. I have built abstraction around GuiceFilter which is
>> initialized on @BeforeClass together with Injector instance, and
>> destroyed on @AfterClass. The idea is to simply call doFilter on
>> GuiceFilter instance in every test, and pass FilterChain instance
>> which will call servlet's doGet or doPost method. I mock
>> ServletContext, HttpSession, HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse
>> with the help of spring-test library. In case of GWT RPC instead of
>> calling servlet's doPost method I just wrap service instance with
>> dynamic proxy which ensures that any method invocation is performed
>> inside GuiceFilter.doFilter method. This way I can test RPC service
>> and avoid any processing in the HTTP stack.
>>
>> > This question is being asked within the context of wicket pages testing.
>>
>> In case of wicket you would have to call WicketFilter instance in the
>> FilterChain in addition to GuiceFilter and construct appropriate
>> HttpServletRequest mock pointing to specific wicket page.
>>
>> --
>> "Meaning is differential not referential"
>>
>> kazik 'morisil' pogoda
>> http://www.xemantic.com/ http://blog.xemantic.com/
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "google-guice" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-guice" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.

Reply via email to