On 8 October 2010 14:59, batkins <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not seeing any exceptions or other error messages, and it's a very > simple construction, so I don't think it's failing. Is there a way to > get better information about the bootstrapping process (more logging, > etc)? >
are you only creating one injector? singletons are per-binding, per-injector btw, an easy way to get a quick stack trace is to put "new Throwable().printStackTrace();" in your constructor - that could help if you turn the JDK logging level to FINE you'll get some trace for the various startup phases (but not for every injection/create) On Oct 8, 9:46 am, Willi Schönborn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 08/10/10 15:35, Jason Winnebeck wrote:> I'm not sure if this is your > problem or not, but myself and a lot of > > > other people have gotten confused when starting with guice that > > > bindings have singleton scope, not classes. For example: if you bind A > > > to X as singleton and B to X as singleton you will actually get two > > > instances of X, because you're saying that A and B are singletons, not > > > X. You need to bind A to X and B to X *then* bind X as singleton if > > > you want both A and B injections to share the same X instance. > > > > That's an excellent point. I encountered another strange situation where > > guice > > instantiates a singleton multiple times: > > In case the bootstrapping fails, guice tries to continue and collect > > any error that occurs to produce that javac-like error message. > > During that boot it may happen that your broken singleton is required > > three times and guice attempts to create it three times. > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > On 10/8/2010 9:26 AM, batkins wrote: > > >> I'm seeing a class bound with asEagerSingleton() constructed 3 times > > >> (based on a log message in the single, default constructor). Why is > > >> this the case? Do I really have 3 instances running around? > > > > >> Thanks > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- Cheers, Stuart -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
