Dan, The problem is that you're trying to create a binding for a class that should only be created through its corresponding factory. This is why you see errors when binding your Function class itself.
What is the expectation you have w.r.t. injecting the Function? -Fred On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Dan Billings <[email protected]> wrote: > I have bound them separately with: > > > > bind(TestAssisted.Factory.class).toProvider(FactoryProvider.newFactory(TestAssisted.Factory.class, > TestAssisted.class)); > functionTypeLiteral = new TypeLiteral<Function<String, > TestAssisted>>() { > }; > > bind(functionTypeLiteral).to(TestAssisted.Factory.class); > > but I get the same error. Whatever process Guice is using to whip up > an implementation to the Assisted factory apparently can't handle > multiple methods, even if it is equals(Object). > > But I still want to use Function in the end. Only the module will > know that it is actually pointing to TestAssisted.Factory. > > On Nov 6, 5:53 pm, Fred Faber <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dan, > > > > You shouldn't be binding the Function itself; instead, you're expected to > > bind TestAssisted.Factory, which creates instances of your Function. > > > > -Fred > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Dan Billings <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm attempting to short-circuit a lot of code by making my Factory > > > interfaces extend Guava's Function: > > > > >http://guava-libraries.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javadoc/com/google/co. > .. > > > > > public class TestAssisted { > > > interface Factory extends Function<String, TestAssisted> {} > > > > > @Inject > > > public TestAssisted(@Assisted String contents){} > > > } > > > > > I then bind it with: > > > bind(new TypeLiteral<Function<String,TestAssisted>>() > > > {}) .toProvider( FactoryProvider.newFactory( > > > TestAssisted.Factory.class,TestAssisted.class ); > > > > > This seems to be okay, but Guice trips over Function's equal's method: > > > > > No implementation for java.lang.String annotated with > > > @com.google.inject.assistedinject.Assisted(value=) was bound. > > > while locating java.lang.String annotated with > > > @com.google.inject.assistedinject.Assisted(value=) > > > for parameter 0 at > > > com.billco.commons.test.TestAssisted.<init>(TestAssisted.java:18) > > > at com.google.common.base.Function.equals(Function.java:1) > > > > > Do I have any options to have Guice more or less ignore the "equals" > > > method declared in Function? I can't think of a good way to stick to > > > interfaces and yet remove the necessity to implement "equals". > > > > > Thanks for your help, > > > -Dan > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "google-guice" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > <google-guice%2bunsubscr...@google groups.com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
