The comments within issue 269<http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=269>and issue 492 <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=492> may be useful.
sam On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 2:14 AM, zixzigma <[email protected]> wrote: > in the documentation on Guice built-in Logger, [1] > the Logger is injected in the constructor. > do you think this is a good idea ? > > almost all classes start with > private static final Logger xx.... > > and to use constructor injection is conceptually wrong ? > > - is it a better idea to use field injection for Logger instead of > constructor injection ? > > - if I decide to use SLF4J + Logback, is using a java.util.logging (JUL) > bridget/adapter > the correct way of making Guice built-in JUL logger working with SLF4J ? > > Thank You > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/BuiltInBindings > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
