I probably should have been a bit clearer - static injection clearly works (except when I get it wrong!), but I am curious whether this approach is still the recommended "best practice" as a way of handling non-serializable objects. It does seem to negate some of the advantages of Guice.
On Aug 24, 6:29 pm, David Sowerby <[email protected]> wrote: > I have read the post > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-guice/browse_thread/thread/4799... > but I am still confused by this issue (and it may have changed since > then, it was 4 years ago) > > The problem is the same - serialising session state in a web app which > has injections of Injector and of Providers - neither of which are > serializable. > > In the previous thread, Bob Lee says this is why he introduced static > injection - but I must be missing something, as I cannot get it to > work. If that is the answer, or for that matter whatever the answer, > could someone post a simple example? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
