Am 03.12.2011 00:18, schrieb Stuart McCulloch:
> On 2 December 2011 14:31, Noctarius <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     You can use:
>
>     Foo foo = new FooImpl();
>     bind(Foo.class).toInstance(foo);
>
>     This is an implicit singleton and you can use the same
>     instance for
>     multiple injectors. Alternativly you can use ChildInjectors.
>
>
> One thing to watch out for with "bind...toInstance(...)" is that
> the injector will inject any fields/setters marked with @Inject in
> the instance. So if you share the same instance between injectors
> it could end up being injected multiple times. In some situations
> this might be what you want (for example you could use a setter to
> add a new element per-injector) but if you want to avoid this then
> use:
>
>    bind( Foo.class ).toProvider( Providers.of( instance ) )
>
> which protects the instance from being injected by the injector.

Nice hint, thanks for the conclusion.

>
>     Cheers Noc
>
>     Am 02.12.2011 15:00, schrieb Sandro Munda:
>     > The @Singleton scope does not refer to the Singleton pattern.
>     >
>     > According to the "Dependency Injection" book of "Dhanji" :
>     >
>     >     "Very simply, a singleton’s context is the injector
>     itself. The
>     > life of a singleton is tied to the life of the injector.
>     Therefore,
>     > only one instance of a singleton is ever created per
>     injector. It is
>     > important to emphasize this last point, since it is possible for
>     > multiple injectors to exist in the same application. In such a
>     > scenario, each injector will hold a different instance of the
>     > singleton-scoped object."
>     >
>     > Thus, is it possible to share the same Singleton instance
>     through
>     > multiple modules and multiple injectors ?
>     >
>     > The same question is available on StackOverflow :
>     >
>     
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8356640/guice-how-to-share-the-same-singleton-instance-through-multiple-injectors-modu
>     >
>     > Thanks.
>     >
>     > Sandro Munda
>     > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >
>
>     --
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>     Google Groups "google-guice" group.
>     To post to this group, send email to
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>.
>     To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:google-guice%[email protected]>.
>     For more options, visit this group at
>     http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers, Stuart
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "google-guice" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.

Reply via email to