Regarding @PostConstruct and guice, you can also take a look at tadedon-guice-lifecycle:
http://code.google.com/p/tadedon/source/browse/tadedon-guice-lifecycle/src/test/java/com/xemantic/tadedon/guice/lifecycle/LifecycleManagerTest.java It should work fine with guice 2 and guice 3. On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Eric Charles <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > (taking back this 2 months old thread...) > > I need @PostConstruct with guice3. Looking around for an updated > guiceyfruit, I found the guice recipe fork > (http://code.google.com/p/guice-recipes/) which had no release for now (and > does not follow guice3-snapshots). > > I finally make give a quick try to a guiceyfruit-3 on my github > (https://github.com/echarles/guiceyfruit-3). I will further test and > certainly contact the guiceyfruit committers to see if there is some > interest on this port. > > But yes, all this sounds like we need something with some people around, > some published release/snapshots for all the guice 3d-party > extensions/integrations... > Should this happen on this mailing list or in another forum such Apache > Incubator,...as previously talked on this thread? > I can contribute some time on this..., anybody interested? > > Thx, > Eric > > On 18/11/11 20:40, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > Hi Stuart! > it would be AMAZING having you involved here!!! > For what I can see, starting up this initiative requires more time > than I expect so I don't think the project would start in a short > while. I would like keep you in the loop even if not fully available, > is it fine for you? > Many thanks for your feedbacks, have a nice day! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 18 Nov 2011, at 13:11, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > uhm, I have the suspect that no more people are interested... :) > > I think it's a good idea, but unfortunately I have zero cycles available > right now :/ ...perhaps after the New Year... > > -- > Cheers, Stuart > > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Simone Tripodi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi again guys! > I don't want you get bored with this topic but just take a look not > only at the 3rdPartyModules wiki page comments[1] but also at how many > ideas/proposals[2] - redundant, sometimes - that have been developed > and didn't catch the attention they deserve! *Maybe* with the help of > a community, they would have gained much more interest - and users. > I hope there is still a strong interest of Guice integrators on > continuing the development of this components!! > Best, > Simo > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/3rdPartyModules > [2] * http://tinyurl.com/6t2kgda > * http://tinyurl.com/79f8wqv > * http://tinyurl.com/ccl33xd > * http://tinyurl.com/83ht36u > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Simone Tripodi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hola Jordi, > thanks for the warm feedback! > > I take advantage from your words to remark that current extension are > already opensourced, but the related development is not open! > So yes, I agree - and that's why I finally decided to send my first > message - joining the effort would benefit no only each single > integration code itself, but a lot of users that would adopt a > community maintained project. > > I really hope this thread continue attracting people's interest :) > All the best, have a nice day! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:17 AM, jordi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey! > That sounds like a fantastic idea to me. A lot of times is hard to start > some nice integration thinking that's just one person effort. And you're not > sure about if there's any real need to do that. > Taken Simone's example, it would be great to have a JUnit integration driven > by the community needs. > If we can join forces around 3rd party integrations I believe big things > will happen! > have a nice day, > jordi > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > the main "issue" I see indeed is that efforts are defragmented - just > take a look at JUnit integrations frameworks - so the idea is moving > all people under an umbrella that encourage a *community* development: > it is not just moving the code and share ideas, is letting the > community actively participate in the development. > I really hope that other people will join us and move that discussion > on the ASF Incubator. > All the best! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Daniel Manzke > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I just can say: I'm totally with you Simon! I really love Guice and my > extension (Automatic Binding for Guice) is also listed. I saw a lot of > interests in this extension and I would be happy, to share the code, > the ideas, the future, ... with more people. > The problem of the most extensions is, that it is developed by just > one person. that's why the adoption is not how it should be. > > Would be interested what the others are thinking. > > Bye, > Daniel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. -- Kazik 'morisil' Pogoda http://memy.xemantic.com/ http://blog.xemantic.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
