Hi,
I would like to consult whether the way I constructed my modules is
the preferred way.
I created a module for each part of the application (a Guice Abstract
module for some logic module in the application).
I have a main module that in its configure method, it uses
install(...) method.
The main class calls this module and the Guice.getInjector() and run
what it need to run.
One of the sub module is not created in the main module, but instead
the main creates it and call the main module with it.
I did it to allow me to do an end2end test with the main module, but
with a different sub module.
Main module:
public MpsModule(Properties properties, MpsServiceModule
moduleForMpsService) {
this.properties = properties;
this.moduleForMpsService = moduleForMpsService;
}
@Override
protected void configure() {
Names.bindProperties(binder(), properties);
convertToTypes(dateMatcher(), dateConverter());
install(new MpsBizModule());
install(new MpsLogicModule());
install(moduleForMpsService);
install(new
ConfigurationModule(MpsConfigurationName.MpsLastProcessingTime.name()));
}
Here's the sub module that I have different implementation for using
different service:
(MpsServiceModule just extends Module)
public class MpsServiceModuleImpl extends AbstractModule implements
MpsServiceModule {
public MpsServiceModuleImpl() {
System.out.println("----------------- MpsServiceModuleImpl
-----------------");
}
@Override
protected void configure() {
ThrowingProviderBinder.create(binder()).bind(MpsServiceProvider.class,
IProductMatchService.class).to(
MpsServiceProviderImpl.class);
}
}
Any comments?
Thanks,
Eyal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
