Glad to hear everything works. Just one more thing: You might want to think about using Akka 2.0 API. RC1 is out and the final is scheduled to come out at the end of the month. There are some substantial changes to the API so you might want to have that in mind.
http://akka.io/docs/akka/snapshot/project/migration-guide-1.3.x-2.0.x.html Cheers Alen On Feb 15, 5:52 pm, Thomas Suckow <[email protected]> wrote: > I did eventually switch to akka actors. > > I also made a helper provider to do what you recommended. > > https://github.com/Deathbobomega/Weave/blob/8e16fcd0005fb78ba66a7f803... > > https://github.com/Deathbobomega/Weave/blob/8e16fcd0005fb78ba66a7f803... > > Thanks! > Thomas Suckow > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Alen Vrečko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry for such late reply. Exam period. Didn't check ML. Will reply as > > somebody might stumble upon this. > > > I did GSoC work for Scala/Akka (will do thesis from it in the coming > > weeks). > > > I only use Akka I imagine it works the same for Scala Actors. I'd > > recommend using Akka - more of everything. ;) > > > In Akka you can do (Scala Actors similar code): > > > class MyActor @Inject (foo:Foo, bar:Bar) extends Actor { > > @Inject baz:Baz = null > > > def receive = { > > .... > > } > > } > > > You have ctor, field and method injection just like in Java. > > > You then need to manually call the injector > > > val actorRef = actorOf(injector.getInstance(classOf[MyActor])).start() > > > There is nothing special about the actor instance itself. What is > > special is how they communicate with each other. > > > You can also do AOP in your Actor as Guice is creating the instance. > > Just keep in mind intercepting receive will actually intercept the > > "partial function" and not the actual "receive". > > > Cheers > > Alen > > > On Jan 31, 4:51 am, Thomas Suckow <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am using Guice with Scala. I am looking into adding the first actors > >> into my application and am a little turned off of using annotations to > >> inject as that would create a bunch more classes. Can anyone think of > >> an easier way to wire them in? > > >> I suppose it really may not be any more classes as the annotation > >> would take the place of a common base class. If anyone has experience > >> with using Actors I would love to hear your story. > > >> Regards, > >> Thomas > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "google-guice" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
