Yep, I think It'll end up this way. I tried to force another way
because our dom is currently bound in a different module (and our app
consists of several separate components, so this sorts of matter), but
I can always reload a specific config file in another location.

Thanks a lot for your help

-- 
Axelle

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Simone Tripodi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Axelle,
>
> you can still use both approaches, they are not mutable exclusive: if
> you bind configurations via Names.bindProperties and annotate your DOM
> with @Named, then request inject the DOM object were needed AND build
> the JDBC connection using the MyBatis integration module.
>
> HTH, all the best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Axelle Ziegler
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>    Yes I did read the samples, and we have a working setup using it,
>> it just forces us to adopt a specific build and implementation pattern
>> for our database configuration files.
>>    We inject the configuration files as custom DOM in all of our app
>> because various configuration files are used across different parts of
>> our application. So we could always switch back to the default mode,
>> but I'd rather explore other options first :)
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> Axelle
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Simone Tripodi
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Axelle,
>>>
>>> did you read the samples of MyBatis-Guice? I honestly don't understand
>>> why you have to map the configuration in a custom DOM when you could
>>> use directly the bound properties.
>>>
>>> Have a look at how a basic sample[1] works and stop feeling pain. Just
>>> use Names.bindProperties and load your JDBC configs. Use a build
>>> profile if you need to include different configs depending on the
>>> environment you are deploying the application.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> -Simo
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>> http://code.google.com/p/mybatis/source/browse/sub-projects/mybatis-guice/trunk/src/test/java/org/mybatis/guice/sample/SampleBasicTest.java
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Axelle Ziegler
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>  Is there any way to use an injected Properties object as an argument
>>>> to Names.bindProperties ?
>>>>
>>>>  Basically our configuration files are injected in a module and we
>>>> need to retrieve them in another module to configure our database
>>>> provider. However, MyBatis-Guice uses Named properties so it means we
>>>> have to create bindings using the content of the Properties object.
>>>>
>>>>  Currently we add a provider for each properties as follow :
>>>>
>>>>    @Provides
>>>>    @Named( "JDBC.username" )
>>>>    String username( @AccountDatabaseProperties final Properties
>>>> databaseConfiguration ) {
>>>>        return databaseConfiguration.getProperty( "JDBC.username" );
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> but that means we have to add one such line for each new property
>>>> name. We could of course simply hold a static list of the property
>>>> names to avoid code duplication, but it would be much more efficient
>>>> to use Names.bindProperties to perform this work, however it seems to
>>>> mean we have to load our properties file in the database configuration
>>>> module. Does anyone see a possible workaround ? Am I missing
>>>> something ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "google-guice" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "google-guice" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "google-guice" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "google-guice" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.

Reply via email to