Am I mistaken in believing this is what Mirko is looking for? One
issue is that multiple annotations do not appear to be supported.
Pseudo Code:
TypeLiteral<Map<String, Integer>> literal = new
TypeLiteral<Map<String, Integer>>() {;}
bind(literal).annotatedWith(Identity.class).to(IdentityHashMap.class)
bind(literal).annotatedWith(SynchronizedLinked.class).to(SynchronizedLinkedHashMap.class)
--
Thomas Suckow
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, April 19, 2012 12:30:27 PM UTC+2, Reinhard Nägele wrote:
>>
>> This is, of course, possible. Look at
>> http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions under
>> "How to inject class with generic type?"
>
>
> Except that Mirko said: “I obviously don't want to create bindings
> specifically for maps from String to Integer, but for maps in general.”
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-guice" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-guice/-/YfM_xhqTIjcJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
