Unfortunately there are features (optional injection) that require he com.google.inject variant so I don't think we're there. We have some other ways we plan to solve this so maybe once those things are in, we can do so. I agree with the sentiment, but i think we're not quite there.
Regards, Christian Sent from my iPhone. On Aug 5, 2012, at 6:00, "MarvinToll.com" <[email protected]> wrote: As the reference implementation for JSR 330 I'm wondering if it would be helpful to mark for deprecation the old Guice versions of annotations. This would be particularily helpful because the old versions come up (alphabetically) first in code completion: com.google.inject vs. javax.inject Said another way... I don't believe I've run into a JSR Reference Implementation that includes a competing API. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-guice/-/X1n30UcmA7YJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
