Yes, that was my intention (as you can see at the Impl naming of 
HttpClientFactoryImpl).

Op vrijdag 22 februari 2013 14:47:17 UTC+1 schreef dhoffer het volgende:
>
> How about also extracting an interface for HttpClientFactoryImpl and let 
> WebCrawler be 
> injected (by Guice) with that interface?  I prefer objects to only know 
> about interfaces of their collaborators.
>
> -Dave
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Bram <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your answers. Would it be possible (and advised?) to implement 
>> my own factory logic for, for instance, a HttpClient? I still have a hard 
>> time accepting that my WebCrawler has to depend on a connection factory, it 
>> doesn't make sense to me (but maby im wrong). (the webcrawler is just an 
>> example to keep it simple btw, my own code is pretty domain specific).
>>
>> If I would implement my own factory for the HttpClient it would look 
>> something like this:
>>
>>     public class HttpClientFactoryImpl {
>>     public HttpClient createClient(Uri uri) {
>>     Connection conn = connectionFactory.create(uri.getHost(), 
>> uri.getPort());
>>     return new HttpClientImpl(conn);
>>     }
>>     }  
>>
>> If my factory would look like that, a webcrawler can only depend on the 
>> HttpClientFactory. That factory is, in my opinion, the onwly factory it 
>> should depend on. Wy would a webcrawler "know" how to create a connection 
>> object? A webcrawler would then look something like this
>>     
>>     class WebCrawler {
>>         private final HttpClientFactory httpClientFactory;
>>
>>         public WebCrawler(HttpClientFactory httpFactory) {...}
>>
>>         public crawlDataFrom(Uri uri) {
>>         HttpClient client = httpClientFactory.createClient(uri);
>>         client.doMagicStuff();
>>         }
>>     }
>>
>>
>> Is something like this possible? Is this "better" or bad-practise? I want 
>> to prevent creating god-like classes that know allot and/or depend on allot.
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "google-guice" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to