On Thursday, June 6, 2013 5:33:22 AM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > > Ok, thank you Tim. That's what I "feared" but I wanted to make sure I was > not missing some feature here. >
It's actually a really Good Thing[tm] that Guice doesn't try to do anything magical with types and polymorphism. I think everyone bumps into something like this early on in using Guice and finds it a little annoying. But later it turns out to be a blessing when something goes wrong and you're trying to sort it out, because you can safely assume that Guice is being pedantically literal in its interpretation of what you asked it to do. Sometimes annoyingly so - as in binding X is not the same as binding X<?> - but it makes what it's going to do very predictable. -Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
