We have been seeing this issue in our application that uses Guice Persist 
as well. +1 to pulling this change into master so it doesn't affect future 
guice-persist users.

On Thursday, July 18, 2013 2:59:42 AM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have pushed a fix for this issue on guice-persist and another user would 
> like it to be integrated in 3.1. See comment on issue: 
> http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=597#c13.
>
> Could this commit be pulled to MASTER? Here the URL of my commit: 
> http://code.google.com/r/remibantos-guice-persist/source/detail?r=3a9d1012fedd403c2aaddc47701f8ace9eaa3eb8
>
>
> Le samedi 9 octobre 2010 01:42:45 UTC+2, dhanji a écrit :
>>
>> What is your JPA provider?
>>
>> Btw how are you checking the object id? If you're looking at its hashcode 
>> that wont tell you anything as hashcodes can repeat. Im not familiar with 
>> eclipse's debugger. We have tests asserting that entitymanagers should not 
>> cross, so I wonder if it is some flushing issue with your JPA provider?
>>
>> Dhanji.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:13 AM, mgbowman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This is a shot in the dark but let me explain what's going on...
>>>
>>> I'm using guice + guice-servlet + guice-persist (20100927) in my
>>> current development efforts. Every method in my business logic which
>>> access the EntityManager is annotated with @Transactional. Using the
>>> Eclipse debugger, I can confirm that at the end of every Transaction
>>> the call to JpaPersistService.end() is called which removes the
>>> ThreadLocal EntityManager instance.
>>>
>>> It seems that on subsequent requests which are handled by a thread
>>> which had already serviced a previous request, the ThreadLocal returns
>>> a previously created EntityManager (confirmed by the object id in the
>>> Eclipse debugger) which is returning a 'stale' state of the database.
>>>
>>> I'm completely at a loss of words on this and I'm going to debug it
>>> more tomorrow. If there's any chance that anybody could give any sort
>>> of insight, it will be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> I will update with any new info as I uncover it.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advanced,
>>> --mgbowman
>>>
>>> Note: I'm running on Java 1.6 + Tomcat 6.0.29 under OS X 10.6.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "google-guice" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to