The more that can be done by default at compile time with Guice, the better!
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Steven Goldfeder <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As a follow up to Christian's > post<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-guice/c8nLliAZ0lQ> about > static analysis using error-prone <https://code.google.com/p/error-prone/>: > would there be interest in adding an annotation processor to Guice so that > we can give compile time errors without depending directly on error-prone? > With a few exceptions, the errors given by the annotation processor would > overlap with the ones that are (or soon will be) in error-prone, but if > there's an interest, we can add most of them as an annotation processor in > Guice. > > If there is an interest, I'd like to complete this in the next few weeks, > so feedback is greatly appreciated. > > Thanks! > > Steven > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
